Full contents
Generated from the document itself, so it never drifts out of step with the text.
Start here
Section titled “Start here”I · History & Nature
Section titled “I · History & Nature”- The History and Nature of Cluster Headaches
- 1 History
- The priority question: who described it first?
- The 19th century: fragments before synthesis
- Wilfred Harris and the 1926 turning point
- Horton, histamine, and the “suicide headache”
- Naming evolution: a syndrome hunting for its name
- From migraine subtype to independent diagnosis: the classification story
- Sjaastad, the “Cluster Club,” and the birth of oxygen therapy
- History in languages other than English
- 2 What a Cluster Headache Is
- The current formal definition (ICHD-3)
- How much does it hurt? The best available quantitative answer
- Attack anatomy: onset, peak, duration, and the restlessness that defines the disease
- Differential diagnosis: cluster headache vs. its look-alikes
- What patients actually say it feels like
- The psychological weight of the disease
II · Mechanism
Section titled “II · Mechanism”III · Epidemiology
Section titled “III · Epidemiology”IV · Diagnosis & Differentials
Section titled “IV · Diagnosis & Differentials”- Types, Diagnosis and What Else It Might Be
- 1 Classification
- 2 The TAC Family & Differentials
- 3 Diagnosis in Practice
- 4 Triggers & Patterns
- 5 Comorbidities & Impact
- References (Part IV)
V · Treatment
Section titled “V · Treatment”- Treatment
- 1.1 High-Flow Oxygen
- 1.2 Triptans
- 1.3 Other Acute Options
- 2 Transitional / Bridge Therapy
- 3 Preventive Treatment
- 3.1 Verapamil
- 3.2 Lithium
- 3.3 Topiramate
- 3.4 Melatonin
- 3.5 Other Weaker-Evidence Preventives
- 3.6 CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies
- CGAL: galcanezumab in episodic CH — the one positive trial
- The chronic CH galcanezumab trial — the failure
- Fremanezumab — both trials terminated
- Eptinezumab: ALLEVIATE and CHRONICLE
- The 2026 meta-analyses: do they genuinely conflict?
- The real-world data — where the community and the trials diverge hardest
- What the community says about Emgality — in detail
- Summary judgement on CGRP mAbs
- 4.0 Framing note: what “refractory chronic CH” means, and why it matters here
- 4.1 Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS / gammaCore)
- What it is
- ACT1 — the first sham-controlled acute trial
- ACT2 — the trial that made the episodic/chronic split undeniable
- Pooled analysis of ACT1 + ACT2
- PREVA — nVNS as a preventive in chronic CH (the one positive chronic trial)
- Real-world open-label data in refractory chronic CH
- Guideline positions
- Regulatory status
- Cost and access — Australia specifically
- Patient community experience and sentiment
- 4.2 Sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) stimulation — Pulsante / Pathway CH-1 and CH-2
- What it is
- Pathway CH-1 — the pivotal European trial
- Pathway CH-2 — the US confirmatory trial
- Pathway R-1 — the European registry (non-Anglophone-led)
- Guideline position
- The commercial collapse — and why this section matters more than the efficacy numbers
- Current status, 2025–2026
- Community sentiment
- 4.3 Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS)
- What it is
- Early evidence base — open-label case series
- ICON — the phase 3 dose-controlled trial
- L-ICON — long-term extension (2–8 years)
- Fogh-Andersen 2026 — the placebo-controlled Danish trial (newest evidence)
- Complication rates across the wider literature
- Guideline position — the most negative in this chapter
- Community experience
- 4.4 Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the posterior hypothalamus
- 4.5 Surgical history — what was tried, and why most of it was abandoned
- Timeline
- Trigeminal nerve section / rhizotomy
- Percutaneous radiofrequency trigeminal gangliorhizolysis
- Gamma knife radiosurgery
- Microvascular decompression (MVD)
- Greater occipital nerve blockade (still used, and standing apart from the rest)
- The EAN’s summary judgement on surgery
- The pattern worth naming
- 4.6 Cross-Cutting Summary Table
- 4.7 Honest Overall Assessment for a Person With Chronic Daily CH
- 5 Access & Practical Realities
- 7 Cross-Cutting Observations, Oddities and Divergences
- The episodic/chronic split is the dominant axis of this entire chapter
- The citizen-science ranking largely validates clinical evidence — with one major exception
- Cardiac monitoring failure on verapamil is real and documented from two independent directions, and the danger window is wider than commonly advised
- Access, not efficacy, is frequently the binding constraint — and this cuts across every treatment category, not just oxygen
- Language bias in the literature is measurable, not hypothetical, and non-English sourcing changed several conclusions in this chapter
- Community practice on hardware/technique frequently outruns formal guidance; community explanations of mechanism frequently lag behind or diverge from it
- The field has been strikingly static for 20–25 years, with a partial exception in neuromodulation
- The disease’s severity is independently documented, not a matter of patient self-report alone
- References (Part V)
VI · Citizen Science
Section titled “VI · Citizen Science”- What Sufferers Have Worked Out: Citizen Science and Community Knowledge
- 1 The Organised Community
- 2 The Vitamin D3 Regimen (“Batch Protocol”)
- 3 Psychedelics — The Community Origin of a Research Agenda
- 4 Other Community-Identified Threads
- 5 Where Community and Clinic Disagree
- References (Part VI)
VII · The Frontier
Section titled “VII · The Frontier”- The Frontier: Current Research and Where This Is Heading
- 5.1 Active Research: The Global Trial Landscape
- The CGRP story: one win, four losses
- What’s genuinely new since the last pass (2024–2026 registrations)
- The psychedelics pipeline, in detail
- PACAP: the strongest un-trialled target in headache medicine
- Orexin antagonists and circadian-targeted drugs — the direct answer to a specific question
- Regional registry coverage — a note relevant to an Australian patient
- Diagram: selected trial timeline
- 5.2 Emerging Science: Genetics, Chronobiology, Imaging, Biomarkers (2023–2026)
- Genetics — the field’s most solid ground, with corrections
- Chronobiology — real phenotype, unsupported genotype
- Imaging — an open, unresolved contradiction
- Biomarkers and inflammation — a corrected and genuinely contested picture
- Competing hypotheses — the field’s live arguments
- Diagram: competing pathophysiology models
- 5.3 The Chronic-CH Problem
- 5.4 Structural Future: Funding, Advocacy, and Realistic Timelines
Unresolved Conflicts
Section titled “Unresolved Conflicts”Open Questions & Loose Threads (Consolidated)
Section titled “Open Questions & Loose Threads (Consolidated)”Editor’s Queries
Section titled “Editor’s Queries”Watchlist
Section titled “Watchlist”Changelog
Section titled “Changelog”This is not medical advice. It is an independent, privately maintained research summary that is revised continuously and may contain errors, omissions or findings since superseded. Treatment decisions belong with a qualified clinician who knows your history.Read the full notice.
If you are in crisis, please stop reading and reach someone now — thecrisis lines are listed here.